![]() Need to apply the same changes to a bunch of images? Well, in that case, Lightroom should be your workhorse of choice. Here are a few main features you'll find in Lightroom but not Photoshop. Lightroom might seem like a more simplistic tool than Photoshop, but that is because it is built around workflow rather than design. So, Photoshop is intended to be used by graphic designers to create and manipulate raster graphics, while Lightroom is geared towards photographers who want to convert and enhance RAW image files. You can learn more about what exactly Lightroom is in our complete guide. However, unlike Photoshop, there are no design tools available in Lightroom. Lightroom also allows you to arrange your files and manipulate photographs, too. It is intended to be used by photographers who want to enhance their photos you can edit JPEGs and RAW files, but you'll have many more options if you choose RAW. Lightroom, on the other hand, is designed solely for editing images. It is intended as a graphics editor and has numerous tools for creating and editing graphics. So, Photoshop is not only capable of manipulating existing images you can also use it to create images completely from scratch. While Photoshop started life as an application for raster graphics editing, it is now an industry standard for all types of graphics editing and design. I access Photoshop from Lightroom for layers.The biggest difference between Photoshop and Lightroom is what they are intended to be used for. The only thing Luminar has that is missing from Lightroom is layers. I once tried to load 20 photos into Luminar. It is ok for editing a single photo, but is not useable for culling, rating, or managing photos. My biggest problem with Luminar is it is painfully slow. The $9.99 monthly fee is worth it to me for both Lightroom CC & PS CC. Lightroom is also, like Luminar, a great non destructive post processor. I have all 3, so in my opinion, Lightroom CC is my favorite, mainly because Lightroom CC is a great organizer of my images using collections, the Organizer in Elements is weak and cumbersome. ![]() ![]() Lightroom is probably on it's last free-standing version, LR6, so other processors will step into the void. You realize that Luminar is Mac-only, right? I saw their ad and was tempted, but I resisted. Open it to the first page and start reading. There are many avenues for that structured learning, and I'll recommend the book Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classroom in a Book. My bet is, you'll find it easier than you thought. But, get some sort of structured learning tools and tackle it. It's powerful enough for the pros and likely will be for you also. If you haven't pursued learning LR/PS, then chances are good you're gonna run into that obstacle with Luminar, as well. ( show quote)Ĭatherine, I know nothing about Luminar, but processing images is somewhat cut and dried. I welcome the opinions of any Luminar users on the list,ĬatherineI currently see Luminar on sale for $59 and I woul. But, what would Luminar give me in terms of either new functionality or ease of use? Is there anything in Luminar that I can't get from LR or PSE, or is there something that's much easier/more enjoyable in Luminar? I am far from a post-processing expert, basically because I've never dedicated the necessary time to learning it properly. I currently see Luminar on sale for $59 and I would like some opinions as to whether it's worth buying given that I already have Lightroom (version 5) and Photoshop Elements 14.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |